19. Control of Validity and Assessment of Accuracy of Telemetry Results during Full-Scale Test of Launch Vehicles
Organization:
Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine
Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2018 (2); 157-172
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2018.02.157
Language: Russian
Annotation: The measurement errors upon conducting flight tests for launch vehicles are evaluated by considering the interferences and uncertainties in the measurement system procedure. Formal use of this approach can lead to unpredictable consequences. More reliable evaluation of errors upon conducted measurements can be achieved if the measurement process is regarded as a procedure of successive activities for designing, manufacturing, and testing the measurement system and the rocket including measurements and their processing during the after-flight analysis of the received data. The sampling rates of the main controlled parameters are three to ten times higher than the frequency range of their changing. Therefore, it is possible to determine the characteristics of the random error components directly on the basis of registered data. The unrevealed systematic components create the basic uncertainty in the evaluation of the examined parameter’s total measurement error. To evaluate the precision and measurement accuracy of a particular launch, the article suggests specifying the preliminary data on measurement error components determined during prelaunch processing and launch. Basic structures of algorithms for evaluation of precision and measurement accuracy for certain mathematical models that form the measured parameters were considered along with the practical case when static correlation existed among the measured parameters.
Key words: flight tests, sensor, measurement error, mathematical model
Bibliography:
1. Novitsky P. V., Zograf I. A. Evaluation of Measurement Errors. L., 1985. 248 p.
2. Shmutzer E. Relativity Theory. Modern Conception. Way to Unity of Physics. М., 1981. 230 p.
3. Blekhman I. I., Myshkis A. D., Panovenko Y. G. Applied Mathematics: Subject, Logic, Peculiarities of Approaches. К., 1976. 270 p.
4. Moiseyev N. N. Mathematical Problems of System Analysis. М., 1981. 488 p.
5. Bryson A., Ho Yu-Shi. Applied Theory of Optimal Control. М., 1972. 544 p.
6. Yevlanov L. G. Monitoring of Dynamic Systems. М., 1972. 424 p.
7. Sergiyenko A. B. Digital Signal Processing: Collection of publications. 2011. 768 p.
8. Braslavsky D. A., Petrov V. V. Precision of Measuring Devices. М., 1976. 312 p.
9. Glinchenko A. S. Digital Signal Processing: Course of lectures. Krasnoyarsk, 2008. 242 p.
10. Garmanov A. V. Practice of Optimization of Signal-Noise Ratio at ACP Connection in Real Conditions. М., 2002. 9 p.
11. Denosenko V. V., Khalyavko A. N. Interference Protection of Sensors and Connecting Wires of Industrial Automation Systems. SТА. No. 1. 2001. P. 68-75.
12. Garmanov A. V. Connection of Measuring Instruments. Solution of Electric Compatibility and Interference Protection Problems. М., 2003. 41 p.
13. TP ACS Encyclopedia. bookASUTR.ru.
14. Smolyak S. A., Titarenko B. P. Stable Estimation Methods. М., 1980. 208 p.
15. Fomin A. F. et al. Rejection of Abnormal Measurement Results. М., 1985. 200 p.
16. Medich J. Statistically Optimal Linear Estimations and Control. М., 1973. 440 p.
17. Sage E., Mells J. Estimation Theory and its Application in Communication and Control. М., 1976. 496 p.
18. Filtration and Stochastic Control in Dynamic Systems: Collection of articles / Under the editorship of K. T. Leondes. М., 1980. 408 p.
19. Krinetsky E. I. et al. Flight Tests of Rockets and Spacecraft. М., 1979. 464 p.
20. Viduyev N. G., Grigorenko A. G. Mathematical Processing of Geodesic Measurements. К., 1978. 376 p.
21. Aivazyan S. A., Yenyukov I. S., Meshalkin L. D. Applied Statistics. Investigation of Dependencies. М., 1985. 487 p.
22. Sirenko V. N., Il’yenko P. V., Semenenko P. V. Use of Statistic Approaches in Analysis of Gas Dynamic Parameters in LV Vented Bays. Space Technology. Missile Armaments: Collection of scientific-technical articles. Issue 1. P. 43-47.
23. Granovsky V. A., Siraya T. N. Methods of Experimental Data Processing at Measurements. L., 1990. 288 p.
24. Zhovinsky A. N., Zhovinsky V. N. Engineering Express Analysis of Random Processes. М., 1979. 112 p.
25. Anishchenko V. A. Control of Authenticity of Duplicated Measurements in Uncertainty Conditions. University News. Minsk, 2010. No. 2. P. 11-18.
26. Anishchenko V. A. Reliability and Accuracy of Triple Measurements of Analog Technological Variables. University News. Minsk, 2017. No. 2. P. 108-117.
27. Shenk H. Theory of Engineering Experiment. М., 1972. 381 p.
28. Bessonov А. А., Sverdlov L. Z. Methods of Statistic Analysis of Automatic Devices Errors. L., 1974. 144 p.
29. Pugachyov V. N. Combined Methods to Determine Probabilistic Characteristics. М., 1973. 256 p. https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2017-60-2-108-117
30. Gandin L. S., Kagan R. L. Statistic Methods of Meteorological Data Interpretation. L., 1976. 360 p.
31. Zheleznov I. G., Semyonov G. P. Combined Estimation of Complex Systems Characteristics. М., 1976. 52 p.
32. Vt222М Absolute Pressure Sensor: ТU Vt2.832.075TU. Penza, 1983.
Full text (PDF) || Content 2018 (2)
Downloads: 39
Abstract views:
1070
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
| Country | City | Downloads |
|---|---|---|
| USA | Boardman; Matawan; Baltimore; Boydton; Plano; Miami; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Seattle; Seattle; Seattle; Ashburn; Seattle; Portland; Portland; San Mateo; Des Moines; Boardman; Ashburn | 23 |
| Singapore | Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore | 5 |
| Indonesia | Jakarta | 1 |
| China | Shanghai | 1 |
| Finland | Helsinki | 1 |
| Unknown | 1 | |
| Great Britain | London | 1 |
| Canada | Monreale | 1 |
| Germany | Falkenstein | 1 |
| Romania | Voluntari | 1 |
| Netherlands | Amsterdam | 1 |
| Belarus | Hrodna | 1 |
| Ukraine | Dnipro | 1 |
Keywords cloud
Visits:1070