Search Results for “Chubarov A. M.” – Collected book of scientific-technical articles https://journal.yuzhnoye.com Space technology. Missile armaments Wed, 06 Nov 2024 11:42:12 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/logo_1.svg Search Results for “Chubarov A. M.” – Collected book of scientific-technical articles https://journal.yuzhnoye.com 32 32 9.1.2023 Methodology for selecting design parameters of solid-propellant sustainer engines. Mathematical support and software https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/content_2023_1-en/annot_9_1_2023-en/ Fri, 12 May 2023 16:11:14 +0000 https://test8.yuzhnoye.com/?page_id=26993
, Chubarov A. Furthermore, the ability of modern technologies to produce different arms systems, which are capable of carrying out same class tasks, considerably increases the risk of making not the best decisions. Alemasov V. V., Chubarov A. Missile armaments , ( Available at: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2023.01.077 . V., Chubarov A. May.2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2023.01.077 . V., Chubarov A. V., Chubarov A. Missile armaments Том: 2023 Випуск: 2023 (1) Рік: 2023 Сторінки: 77—87.doi: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2023.01.077 . V., Chubarov A. Missile armaments Том: 2023 Випуск: 2023 (1) Рік: 2023 Сторінки: 77—87.doi: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2023.01.077 . V., Chubarov A. Missile armaments Том: 2023 Випуск: 2023 (1) Рік: 2023 Сторінки: 77—87.doi: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2023.01.077 .
]]>

9. Methodology for selecting design parameters of solid-propellant sustainer engines. Mathematical support and software

Organization:

Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2023 (1); 77-87

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2023.01.077

Language: Ukrainian

Annotation: Substantiation of the research tools has been performed as a part of methodology development for the air and missile defense system. The problem under consideration is very complex due to the multifactorial nature of the research object, its qualitative variety and manifold structure, incomplete definition of the problem statement. Furthermore, the ability of modern technologies to produce different arms systems, which are capable of carrying out same class tasks, considerably increases the risk of making not the best decisions. Based on this, as well as taking into account the sharp increase in the cost of weaponry, the considered problem is classified as an optimization one that should be solved through the theory of operations research. In this theory, such task is viewed as a mathematical problem, and mathematical simulation is the basic method of research. The main types of mathematical models, their areas of application have been considered as a part of the analysis. The classification of mathematical models has been indicated according to the scale of reproduced operations, purpose, and goal orientation. Quantitative and qualitative correlation of forces has been accepted as the efficiency criterion, which determines a goal orientation of the model. The problems related to this have been shown. In particular, searching for the compromise between simplicity of the mathematical model and its adequacy to the research object is among these problems. Two of the basic approaches to principles of the military operation model construction and its assessment have been considered. The first is implemented through modeling of the combat operations. The second approach is based on the assumption that different armament types can be compared based on their contribution to the outcome of the operation, and on the possibility to assign «a weighting coefficient» named as a combat potential to each of these types. The modern level of problem solving related to this method has been shown. The reasonability of its application in the considered task, including the definition of forces correlation of the opposing parties, has been substantiated. The basic regulations of the construction concept of the required mathematical model and tools for its research have been formulated based on the analysis results: the assigned problem should be solved by analytical methods through the theory of operations research; the analytical model is the most acceptable conception of the analyzed level of the military operation; the synthesis of the model should be based on the idea of a combat potential. At the same time, it should be taken into account that the known approach to the definition of forces correlation, which uses the combat potential method, has a number of essential limitations, including the methodological ones. Therefore, within the bounds of further research, this approach requires the development both in terms of improving the reliability of the single assessment and in terms of giving the system qualities to the synthesized mathematical model.

Key words: multifunctional system, mathematical model, military unit, combat potential, correlation of forces, defensive sufficiency

Bibliography:

1. Pavlyuk Yu. S. Ballisticheskoe proektirovanie raket: ucheb.-metod, posobie dlya vuzov. UDK623.451.8. Izd-vo ChGTU, Chelyabinsk, 1996. 92 s.
2. Nikolaev Yu. M., Solomonov Yu. S. Inzhenernoe proektirovanie upravlyaemykh ballisticheskikh raket s RDTT. M., 1979. 240 s.
3. Enotov V. G., Kirichenko A. S., Pustovgarova Ye. V. Osobennosti rascheta i vybora raskhodnoy diagrammy dvukhrezhimnykh marshevykh RDTT: ucheb.-metod. posobie. Pod red. akadem. A. V. Degtyreva. Dnepr, 2019. 68 s.
4. Enotov V. G., Kushnir B. I., Pustovgarova Ye. V. Metodika-programma proektnoy otsenki characteristic marshevykh dvigateley na tverdom toplive s korpusami iz vysokoprochnykh metallicheskikh materialov, statsionarnymi soplami i postanovka ee na avtomatizirovanniy raschet: ucheb.-metod. posobie. Vtoroe izd., pererabot. i dop. Pod red. A. S. Kirichenko. Dnep, 2019. 91 s.
5. Enotov V. G., Kirichenko A. S., Kushnir B. I., Pustovgarova Ye. V. Metodika proektnoy otsenki characteristic marshevykh dvigatelnykh ustanovok na tverdom toplive s povorotnymi upravlyayuschimi soplami, plastikovymi tselnomotannymi korpusamy i postanovka ee na avtomatizirovanniy raschet: ucheb.-metod. posobie. Vtoroe izd., pererabot. i dop. Pod red. akadem. A. V. Degtyareva. Dnepr. 2019. 149 s.
6. Alemasov V. Ye., Dregalin A. F., Tishin A. P. Teoriya raketnykh dvigateley. M., 1980. 55 s.
7. Raschetnye materialy dlya podgotovki i vydachi iskhodnykh dannykh na razrabotku uzlov marshevykh dvigatelnykh ustanovok na tverdom toplive. Raschet ID metodom avtomatizirovannogo proektirovaniya operativno-takticheskikh raket: inzhenern. zapiska 553-376 IZ. GP «KB «Yuzhnoye». Dnepropetrovsk, 2017. 30 s.
8. Metodika avtomatizirovannogo proektirovaniya operativno-takticheskikh raket: nauch.-tekhn. Otchet 03-453/32 NTO. GP «KB «Yuzhnoye». Dnepropetrovsk, 2010. 127 s.

Downloads: 5
Abstract views: 
1278
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
CountryCityDownloads
Unknown1
USA Columbus1
Singapore Singapore1
Germany Falkenstein1
Ukraine Kremenchuk1
9.1.2023 Methodology for selecting design parameters of solid-propellant sustainer engines. Mathematical support and software
9.1.2023 Methodology for selecting design parameters of solid-propellant sustainer engines. Mathematical support and software
9.1.2023 Methodology for selecting design parameters of solid-propellant sustainer engines. Mathematical support and software

Keywords cloud

]]>