2.1.2020 Analysis of development trends of design parameters and basic characteristics of missiles for the advanced multiple launch rocket systems

Вацлав Самусевич

2. Analysis of development trends of design parameters and basic characteristics of missiles for the advanced multiple launch rocket systems

Authors:

Aksenenko A. V.¹, Hurskyi O. I.¹, Klochkov A. S.¹, Kondratiuk Ye. A.¹, Senkin V. S.², Siutkina-Doronina S. V.²

Organization:

Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine¹; The Institute of Technical Mechanics, Dnipro, Ukraine²

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2020, (1); 13-25

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2020.01.013

Language: Russian

Annotation: The scientific and methodological propositions for the designing single-stage guided missiles with the solid rocket motors for advanced multiple launch rocket systems are defined. The guided missiles of multiple launch rocket system are intended for delivering munitions to the given spatial point with required and specified kinematic motion parameters at the end of flight. The aim of the article is an analysis of the development trends of the guided missiles with the solid rocket motors for the multiple launch rocket systems, identifying the characteristics and requirements for the flight trajectories, design parameters, control programs, overall dimensions and mass characteristics, structural layout and aerodynamic schemes of missiles. The formalization of the complex task to optimize design parameters, trajectory parameters and motion control programs for the guided missiles capable of flying along the ballistic, aeroballistic or combined trajectories is given. The complex task belongs to a problem of the optimal control theory with limitations in form of equa lity, inequality and differential constraints. To simplify the problem, an approach to program forming is proposed for motion control in the form of polynomial that brings the problem of the optimal control theory to a simpler problem of nonlinear mathematical programming. When trajectory parameters were calculated the missile was regarded as a material point of variable mass and the combined equations for center-of-mass motion of the guided missile with projections on axes of the terrestrial reference system were used. The structure of the mathematical model was given along with the calculation sequence of the criterion function that was used for determination of the optimal parameters, programs and characteristics. The mathematical model of the guided missile provides adequate accuracy for design study to determine depending on the main design parameters: overall dimensions and mass characteristics of the guided missile in general and its structural comp onents and subsystems; power, thrust and consumption characteristics of the rocket motor; aerodynamic and ballistic characteristics of the guided missile. The developed methodology was tested by determining design and trajectory parameters, overall dimensions and mass characteristics, power and ballistic characteristics of two guided missiles with wings for advanced multiple launch rocket systems produced by the People’s Republic of China, using the limited amount of information available in the product catalog.

Key words: multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS), complex problem of the optimal control theory, problem of nonlinear mathematical programming, main solid rocket motor, limitations for motion parameters and basic characteristics of the guided missiles

Bibliography:

1. Degtyarev A. V. Raketnaia tekhnika. Problemy i perspektivy: izbrannye nauchno-tekhnicheskie publikatsii. Dnepropetrovsk, 2014. 420 s.

2. Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku zdiisnennia derzhavnoho kontriliu za mizhnarodnymy peredachamy tovariv podviinoho vykorystannia:Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 28 sichnia 2004 r. № 86. Date: 29.11.2018. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/86-2004-%D0%BF (Access date 01.09.2019).

3. Catalogue China Aerospase Long-march International. February, 2017. 136 p.

4. Reaktivnye sistemy zalpovogo ognia zarubezhnykh stran: obzor po materialam otkrytoi pechati za 1987–2016 gg. i interneta. Dnipro, 2016. Ч. I. 205 s.

5. Upravliaemye OTRK i TRK stran mira: obzor po materialam otkrytoi otechestvennoi i zarubezhnoi pechati za 2008–2014 gg. i interneta. Dnipro, 2014. 162 s.

6. Tail controlled rocket demonstrates near-vertical impact at extended range. URL: https://www.army.mil/article-amp/207357/tail_controlled_rocket_demonstrates_near_vertical_impact_at_extended_range (Access date 01.09.2019).

7. SY-400 Short-Range Ballistic Missile. URL: http://www.military-today.com/missiles/sy_400.htm (Access date 01.09.2019).

8. Vohniana “Vilkha”: nova vysokotochna systema zalpovoho vohnyu. Vpershe – detalno. URL: https://defence-ua.com/index.php/statti/4588-vohnyana-vilkha-nova-vysokotochna-systema-zalpovoho-vohnyu-vpershe-detalno (Access date 01.09.2019).

9. Gurov S. V. Reaktivnye sistemy zalpovogo ognia: obzor. 1-е izd. Tula, 2006. 432 s.

10. The new M30A1 GMLRS Alternate Warhead to replace cluster bombs for US Army Central 71601171. URL: https://www.armyrecognition.com/weapons_defence_industry_military_technology_uk/the_new_m30a1_gmlrs_alternate_warhead_to_replace_cluster_bombs_for_us_army_central_71601171.html (Access date 01.09.2019).

11. High-Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), a member of MLRS family. URL: https://army-technology.com/projects/himars/ (Access date 01.09.2019).

12. SR-5 Multiple Launch Rocket System. URL: http://www.military-today.com/artillery/sr5.htm (Access date 01.09.2019).

13. Effectivnost slozhnykh system. Dinamicheskie modeli / V. А. Vinogradov, V. А. Hrushchansky, S. S. Dovhodush i dr. М., 1989. 285 s.

14. Ilichev А. V., Volkov V. D., Hrushchansky V. А. Effectivnost proektiruemykh elementov slozhnykh system: ucheb. posobie. М., 1982. 280 s.

15. Krotov V. F., Gurman V. I. Metody I zadachi optimalnogo upravleniia. М., 1973. 446 s.

16. Pontriagin L. S., Boltiansky V. G., Gamkrelidze R. V., Mishchenko Е. F. Matematicheskaia teoriia optimalnykh protsesov. М., 1969. 385 s.

17. Tarasov Е. V. Algoritm optimalnogo proektirovaniia letatelnogo apparata. М., 1970. 364 s.

18. Shcheverov D. N. Proektirovanie bespilotnykh letatelnykh apparatov. М., 1978. 264 s.

19. Siniukov А. М., Volkov L. I., Lvov А. I., Shishkevich А. М. Ballisticheskaia raketa na tverdom toplive / pod red. А. М. Siniukova. М., 1972. 511 s.

20. Burov М. А., Varfolomeev V. I., Volkov L. I. Proektirovanie i ispytanie ballisticheskikh raket / pod red. V. I. Varfolomeeva, М. I. Kopytova. М., 1970. 392 s.

21. Siutkina-Doronina S. V. K voprosu optimizatsii proektnykh parametrov i programm upravleniia raketnogo ob’ekta s raketnym dvigatelem na tverdom toplive. Aviatsionno-kosmicheskaia tekhnika i tekhnologiia. 2017. № 2 (137). S. 44–59.

22. Aksenenko A. V., Baranov E. Yu., Hursky A. I., Klochkov A. S., Morozov A. S., Alpatov A. P., Senkin V. S., Siutkina-Doronina S. V. Metodicheskoe obespechenie dlia optimizatsii na nachalnom etape proektirovaniia proektnykh parametrov, parametrov traektorii i programm upravleniia dvizheniem raketnogo ob’ekta. Kosmicheskaia tekhnika. Raketnoe vooruzhenie: sb. nauch.-tekhn. st. / GP “KB “Yuzhnoye”. Dnipro, 2018. Vyp. 2 (116). S. 101–116. https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2018.02.101

23. Metodicheskoe obespechenie dlia optimizatsii na nachalnom etape proektirovaniia proektnykh parametrov, programm upravleniia, ballisticheskikh, energeticheskikh i gabaritno-massovykh kharakteristik upravliaemykh raketnykh ob’ektov, osushchestvliaiushchikh dvizhenie po aeroballisticheskoi traektorii: otchet po NIR / ITM NANU i GKAU, GP “KB “Yuzhnoye”. Dnepropetrovsk, 2017. 159 S.

24. Senkin V. S. K Vyboru programm upravleniia dvizheniem raketnogo ob’ekta po ballisticheskoi traektorii. Tekhnicheskaia mekhanika. 2018. № 1. S. 48–59.

25. Alpatov A. P., Senkin V. S. Metodicheskoe obespechenie dlia vybora oblika, optimizatsii proektnykh parametrov i programm upravleniia poletom rakety-nositelia. Tekhnicheskaia mekhanika. 2013. № 4. S. 146–161.

26. Alpatov A. P., Senkin V. S. Kompleksnaia zadacha optimizatsii osnovnykh proektnykh parametrov i programm upravleniia dvizheniem raket kosmicheskogo naznacheniia. Tekhnicheskaia mekhanika. 2011. № 4. S. 98–113.

27. Senkin V. S. Optimizatsiia proektnykh parametrov rakety-nositelia sverkhlegkogo klassa. Tekhnicheskaia mekhanika. 2009. № 1. S. 80–88.

28. Lebedev А. А., Gerasiuta N. F. Ballistika raket. М., 1970. 244 s.

29. Razumev V. F., Kovalev B. K. Osnovy proektirovaniia ballisticheskikh raket na tverdom toplive: ucheb. posobie dlia vuzov. М., 1976. 356 s.

30. Erokhin B. Т. Teoreticheskie osnovy oroektirovaniia RDTT. М., 1982. 206 s.

31. Abugov D. I., Bobylev V. М. Teoriia i raschet raketnykh dvigatelei tverdogo topliva: uchebnik dlia mashinostroitelnykh vuzov. М., 1987. 272 s.

32. Shishkov А. А. Gasodinamika porokhovykh raketnykh dvigatelei: inzhenernye metody rascheta. М., 1974. 156 s.

Full text (PDF) || Content 2020 (1)

Downloads: 42

Abstract views:

3493

Dynamics of article downloads

Dynamics of abstract views

Downloads geography

Country	City	Downloads
USA	Ashburn; Matawan; Baltimore; Plano; Miami; Columbus; Columbus; Columbus; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Ashburn; Tappahannock; Portland; San Mateo; San Mateo; San Mateo; Des Moines; Boardman; Boardman; Boardman; Seattle	24
Singapore	Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore	6
Latvia	Riga; Riga	2
Ukraine	Dnipro; Dnipro	2
China	Shanghai	1
Finland	Helsinki	1
Unknown		1
India	Mumbai	1
Canada	Monreale	1
Germany	Falkenstein	1
Romania	Voluntari	1
Netherlands	Amsterdam	1

Downloads, views for all articles

Articles, downloads, views by all authors

Articles for all companies

Geography of downloads articles

Keywords cloud

3.1.2017 Development Strength Test of Modified Antares ILV

Виктория Лемех — Thu, 22 Jun 2023 12:48:29 +0000

3. Development Strength Test of Modified Antares ILV

Authors:

Klimenko D. V.¹, Kuryachiy Е. V.¹, Mishchenko O. I.², Frolov V. P.¹

Organization:

Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine¹; DPHZ-DKAU, Dnipro, Ukraine²

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2017 (1); 18-22