Search Results for “Voloshina M. O.” – Collected book of scientific-technical articles https://journal.yuzhnoye.com Space technology. Missile armaments Tue, 02 Apr 2024 12:35:49 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/logo_1.svg Search Results for “Voloshina M. O.” – Collected book of scientific-technical articles https://journal.yuzhnoye.com 32 32 22.2.2018 Uncertainty Calculation Procedure during Measuring Instrumentation Calibration https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/content_2018_2-en/annot_22_2_2018-en/ Thu, 07 Sep 2023 12:34:07 +0000 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/?page_id=30810
Uncertainty Calculation Procedure during Measuring Instrumentation Calibration Authors: Voloshina M. Content 2018 (2) Downloads: 35 Abstract views: 1714 Dynamics of article downloads Dynamics of abstract views Downloads geography Country City Downloads USA Ashburn; Matawan; Baltimore; Plano; Columbus; Columbus; Detroit; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Ashburn; Boardman; Seattle; Tappahannock; Portland; San Mateo; Des Moines; Boardman; Boardman; Ashburn 20 Singapore Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore 8 Finland Helsinki 1 Unknown 1 Canada Monreale 1 Germany Falkenstein 1 Romania Voluntari 1 Netherlands Amsterdam 1 Ukraine Dnipro 1 Downloads, views for all articles Articles, downloads, views by all authors Articles for all companies Geography of downloads articles Voloshina M. Voloshina M. Uncertainty Calculation Procedure during Measuring Instrumentation Calibration Автори: Voloshina M.
]]>

22. Uncertainty Calculation Procedure during Measuring Instrumentation Calibration

Organization:

Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2018 (2); 184-189

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2018.02.184

Language: Russian

Annotation: The effective documents in the field of metrological support require evaluating measurement uncertainty during measuring instrumentation calibration. In Ukraine, there is no regulated procedure of uncertainty calculation during measuring instrumentation calibration, which causes the necessity of developing such procedure. This article proposes the measurement uncertainty calculation procedure during measuring instrumentation calibration, according to which the following calculations shall be made: a) of standard uncertainty of A type for corrected observation results obtained during calibration; b) of standard uncertainties of B type caused by error or uncertainty of working standard applied, calculation discreteness or calibrated measuring instrument division value, variation of calibrated measuring instrument indications; c) of total standard measurement uncertainty; d) of augmented measurement uncertainty. As an example, the results of calculation of augmented measurement uncertainty during calibration are presented: – for 795M107B vibrometer in complete set with AC102-1A accelerometer; – for alternating voltage measurement channel of a measuring and computing complex of MIC type; – for a manometer of MT type. The obtained results of measurement uncertainty calculation are presented in the form of tables of measurement uncertainty budget, which shall be entered in the measuring instrument calibration certificate together with the observation results obtained during calibration. The proposed uncertainty calculation procedure is applicable for the given types of measuring instruments whose calibration is performed by method of direct measurement of known measurement values represented or controlled by working standards.

Key words: augmented measurement uncertainty, multiple measurements, measurement uncertainty budget, vibrometer, manometer of MT type, computing complex of MIC type

Bibliography:
1. The Law of Ukraine “On Metrology and Metrological Activity”. Supreme Rada News (SRN). 2014. No. 30. P. 1008.
2. General Requirements to Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories (ISO/IEC17025:2005, IDT): DSTU ISO/IEC17025:2006. К., 2007. 26 p.
3. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Geneva: ISO, 1993. 101 p.
4. Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration: ЕА–4/02 М:2013. European Association for Accreditation, 2013. 75 p.
5. Bondar’ M. A et al. Methodology of Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation during Measuring Instrumentation Certification. Space Technology. Missile Armaments: Collection of scientific-technical articles. 2017. Issue 1. P. 3-7.
Downloads: 35
Abstract views: 
1714
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
CountryCityDownloads
USA Ashburn; Matawan; Baltimore; Plano; Columbus; Columbus; Detroit; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Ashburn; Boardman; Seattle; Tappahannock; Portland; San Mateo; Des Moines; Boardman; Boardman; Ashburn20
Singapore Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore8
Finland Helsinki1
Unknown1
Canada Monreale1
Germany Falkenstein1
Romania Voluntari1
Netherlands Amsterdam1
Ukraine Dnipro1
22.2.2018 Uncertainty Calculation Procedure during Measuring Instrumentation Calibration
22.2.2018 Uncertainty Calculation Procedure during Measuring Instrumentation Calibration
22.2.2018 Uncertainty Calculation Procedure during Measuring Instrumentation Calibration

Keywords cloud

]]>
1.1.2017 Methodology for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation during Metrological Certification of Measuring Instruments https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/content_2017_1/annot_1_1_2017-en/ Wed, 19 Jul 2023 06:34:56 +0000 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/?page_id=29354
, Voloshina M. А., Voloshina M. А., Voloshina M. А., Voloshina M. А., Voloshina M. А., Voloshina M. А., Voloshina M.
]]>

1. Methodology for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation during Metrological Certification of Measuring Instruments

Organization:

Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2017 (1); 3-7

Language: Russian

Annotation: The analysis is presented of measurement uncertainties components by A and B types during metrological certification of measuring instrumentation. The example is presented of the evaluation of measurement uncertainties of pressure measurement channel. Introduction of the methodology under consideration will ensure compliance of the metrological characteristics determined with the regulations of international normative documents.

Key words:

Bibliography:
Downloads: 44
Abstract views: 
437
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
CountryCityDownloads
USA Boardman; Ashburn; Ashburn; Ashburn; Columbus;; Los Angeles; Monroe; Ashburn; Seattle; Ashburn; Seattle; Tappahannock; Portland; San Mateo; San Mateo; San Mateo; Des Moines; Boardman; Boardman; Ashburn; Boardman22
Singapore Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore13
Ukraine Dnipro; Dnipro2
Germany Falkenstein;2
Belgium Brussels1
Unknown1
Finland Helsinki1
Romania Voluntari1
Netherlands Amsterdam1
1.1.2017 Methodology for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation during Metrological Certification of Measuring Instruments
1.1.2017 Methodology for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation during Metrological Certification of Measuring Instruments
1.1.2017 Methodology for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation during Metrological Certification of Measuring Instruments
]]>
22.1.2019 Calculation of Uncertainty of Represented Values of Linear Accelerations during Centrifugal Machines Certification https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/content_2019_1-en/annot_22_1_2019-en/ Wed, 24 May 2023 16:00:54 +0000 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/?page_id=27727
, Voloshina M. А., Voloshina M. А., Voloshina M. А., Voloshina M. А., Voloshina M. А., Voloshina M. А., Voloshina M.
]]>

22. Calculation of Uncertainty of Represented Values of Linear Accelerations during Centrifugal Machines Certification

Organization:

Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2019, (1); 149-153

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2019.01.149

Language: Russian

Annotation: Applicable documents on metrological assurance regulate the estimation of measurement uncertainty. In Ukraine there is no regulative methodology for uncertainty calculation when certificating test equipment that causes the necessity of its definition. This article offers the methodology for uncertainty calculation when certificating a centrifugal machine that is used to reproduce precisely the given value of linear acceleration that permanently acts on a tested unit spinning together with a rotor. The offered methodology for uncertainty calculation is applicable to centrifugal machines, for which numerical values of reproducible linear acceleration are determined by results of calculations of the centrifugal machine’s rotor angular velocity and radial distance from rotor’s longitudinal axis to the given point of the tested unit. Initial data used were results of observation obtained after multiple reproductions of the given values of linear acceleration as well as numerical values of errors and measurement uncertainties of measuring equipment that was used when monitoring the rotary angular velocity and radial distance considering the contribution of each measurable parameter to a certain value of linear acceleration. The calculation given in the article estimates the limit of linear accelerations that can be attributed with established probability to the given value of linear acceleration reproduced when certificating the centrifugal machine. The design formulae are given to estimate the uncertainty components of the reproducible values of linear accelerations and the recommendations are given to present the uncertainty budget.

Key words: extended uncertainty, standard uncertainty, sensitivity coefficient, measurement uncertainty contribution, frequency meter

Bibliography:
1. GOST 24555. Poryadok attestatsii ispytatelnogo oborudovania. Osnovnye polozheniya. Vved. 27.01.81. M.: Gosstandart, 1982. 12 p.
2. https://www.twirpx.com/file/1791976.
3. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement: ISO. Geneva, 1993. 101 p.
4. Zakon Ukrainy «Pro metrologiu ta metrologychnu diyalnist’»// Vidom. Verkhovnoi Rady (VVR). 2014. № 30. P.1008.
5. Duplischeva O. M. i dr. Experimentalnaya otrabotka agregatov avtomatiki I system letatelnykh apparatov/ Pod obsch. red. d. t. n. A. V. Degtyareva. Dnepropetrovsk: GP KB «Yuzhnoye» im. M. K. Yangelya», 2013. 208 p.
6. Bondar’ M. A. i dr. Metodologia otsenivania neopredelennosti izmerenniy pri provedenii attestatsii sredstv izmeritelnoi techniki//Kosmicheskaya technika. Raketnoe vooruzhenie: Sb. nauch. – techn. st. 2017. Vyp. 1. P. 3–7.
Downloads: 33
Abstract views: 
606
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
CountryCityDownloads
USA Boardman; Ashburn; Baltimore;; Los Angeles; Plano; Monroe; Seattle; Columbus; Ashburn; Seattle; Seattle; Tappahannock; Portland; San Mateo; Des Moines; Boardman; Boardman; Ashburn; Boardman20
Singapore Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore6
Belgium Brussels; Brussels2
Philippines Olongapo City1
Germany Falkenstein1
Romania Voluntari1
Netherlands Amsterdam1
Ukraine Dnipro1
22.1.2019 Calculation of Uncertainty of Represented Values of Linear Accelerations during Centrifugal Machines Certification
22.1.2019 Calculation of Uncertainty of Represented Values of Linear Accelerations during Centrifugal Machines Certification
22.1.2019 Calculation of Uncertainty of Represented Values of Linear Accelerations during Centrifugal Machines Certification

Keywords cloud

]]>
14.2.2019 Selection of the validation algorithm for the solid rocket motor trust measurement procedure https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/content_2019_2-en/annot_14_2_2019-en/ Mon, 15 May 2023 15:46:10 +0000 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/?page_id=27216
Selection of the validation algorithm for the solid rocket motor trust measurement procedure Authors: Voloshina M. Content 2019 (2) Downloads: 37 Abstract views: 762 Dynamics of article downloads Dynamics of abstract views Downloads geography Country City Downloads USA Boardman; Matawan; Baltimore; Plano; Dublin; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Ashburn; Ashburn; Seattle; Tappahannock; Portland; San Mateo; San Mateo; San Mateo; Des Moines; Des Moines; Boardman; Boardman; Ashburn; Boardman 22 Singapore Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore 7 China Shanghai 1 Finland Helsinki 1 Unknown 1 Canada Monreale 1 Germany Falkenstein 1 Romania Voluntari 1 Netherlands Amsterdam 1 Ukraine Dnipro 1 Downloads, views for all articles Articles, downloads, views by all authors Articles for all companies Geography of downloads articles Voloshina M. Voloshina M. Selection of the validation algorithm for the solid rocket motor trust measurement procedure Автори: Voloshina M.
]]>

14. Selection of the validation algorithm for the solid rocket motor trust measurement procedure

Organization:

Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2019, (2); 103-108

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2019.02.103

Language: Russian

Annotation: The solid rocket motors thrust is measured according to the developed measurement procedure; fulfilment of its requirements guarantees obtaining the results with required accuracy parameters. Compliance of this procedure with the measurement accuracy requirements is confirmed by way of its validation that can be performed according to different algorithms. The proposed article deals with two validation algorithms of measurement procedure for solid rocket motor thrust up to 30 tf – end-to-end and link-by-link validation methods. The composition of measurement channel, the experimental works performed at each validation algorithm are described, the calculation formulas to evaluate the limits of absolute measurement error and the obtained numerical values of the latter are presented. The comparative analysis of the results of validation procedure of solid rocket motor thrust measurement procedure obtained during metrological investigations of thrust measurement channel by end-to-end and link-by-link validation methods shows that to ensure the required measurement accuracy, the algorithms of end-to-end method is preferable, at which the lower values of reduced error can be obtained as compared with the algorithm of link-by-link validation.

Key words: measurement channel, reduced error, calibration characteristic, electric signal.

Bibliography:
1. Kotsyuba A. M., Zgurya V. I. Otsinyuvannya prydantosti (validatsiya) metodik vyprobuvannya ta calibruvannya: detalizatsia vymog. Metrologia ta prylady. 2013. № 6. S. 22–24.
2. Kotsyuba A. M., Domnytska V. K., Kotsyuba L. G. Validatsia metodik calibruvannya. Standartizatsia, certifikatsia, yakist’. 2016. № 1. S. 41–45.
3. Kotsyuba A. M. Validatsia metodik calibruvannya mir fizichnykh velichin. Systemy obrobky informatsii. 2015. № 2 (127). S. 35–39.
Downloads: 37
Abstract views: 
762
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
CountryCityDownloads
USA Boardman; Matawan; Baltimore; Plano; Dublin; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Ashburn; Ashburn; Seattle; Tappahannock; Portland; San Mateo; San Mateo; San Mateo; Des Moines; Des Moines; Boardman; Boardman; Ashburn; Boardman22
Singapore Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore7
China Shanghai1
Finland Helsinki1
Unknown1
Canada Monreale1
Germany Falkenstein1
Romania Voluntari1
Netherlands Amsterdam1
Ukraine Dnipro1
14.2.2019 Selection of the validation algorithm for the solid rocket motor trust measurement procedure
14.2.2019 Selection of the validation algorithm for the solid rocket motor trust measurement procedure
14.2.2019 Selection of the validation algorithm for the solid rocket motor trust measurement procedure

Keywords cloud

Your browser doesn't support the HTML5 CANVAS tag.
]]>