Annotation: The effective documents in the field of metrological support require evaluating measurement uncertainty during measuring instrumentation calibration. In Ukraine, there is no regulated procedure of uncertainty calculation during measuring instrumentation calibration, which causes the necessity of developing such procedure. This article proposes the measurement uncertainty calculation procedure during measuring instrumentation calibration, according to which the following calculations shall be made: a) of standard uncertainty of A type for corrected observation results obtained during calibration; b) of standard uncertainties of B type caused by error or uncertainty of working standard applied, calculation discreteness or calibrated measuring instrument division value, variation of calibrated measuring instrument indications; c) of total standard measurement uncertainty; d) of augmented measurement uncertainty. As an example, the results of calculation of augmented measurement uncertainty during calibration are presented: – for 795M107B vibrometer in complete set with AC102-1A accelerometer; – for alternating voltage measurement channel of a measuring and computing complex of MIC type; – for a manometer of MT type. The obtained results of measurement uncertainty calculation are presented in the form of tables of measurement uncertainty budget, which shall be entered in the measuring instrument calibration certificate together with the observation results obtained during calibration. The proposed uncertainty calculation procedure is applicable for the given types of measuring instruments whose calibration is performed by method of direct measurement of known measurement values represented or controlled by working standards.

Annotation: The description of the program and its work on the part of the user is given as well as a description of the software automation solution from the programmer’s side. The introduction of an automated program has significantly accelerated the process of attestation of climatic chambers.

Annotation: The analysis is presented of measurement uncertainties components by A and B types during metrological certification of measuring instrumentation. The example is presented of the evaluation of measurement uncertainties of pressure measurement channel. Introduction of the methodology under consideration will ensure compliance of the metrological characteristics determined with the regulations of international normative documents.

Annotation: The method not used before to measure discontinuity of working fluid using video recorders is considered. To ensure the uniformity of measurements when reducing this method to practice, the methodology of its certification experimental investigations is proposed for the purpose of determination of its applicability limits.

Annotation: Example of the estimate of the measurement error of the linear accelerations during the free fall of the kinematic model is considered. It was concluded that experiments on error measurements can be replaced with calculations for those parameters which have sufficient initial data on metrological performance of the applied instrumentation.

Annotation: Applicable documents on metrological assurance regulate the estimation of measurement uncertainty. In Ukraine there is no regulative methodology for uncertainty calculation when certificating test equipment that causes the necessity of its definition. This article offers the methodology for uncertainty calculation when certificating a centrifugal machine that is used to reproduce precisely the given value of linear acceleration that permanently acts on a tested unit spinning together with a rotor. The offered methodology for uncertainty calculation is applicable to centrifugal machines, for which numerical values of reproducible linear acceleration are determined by results of calculations of the centrifugal machine’s rotor angular velocity and radial distance from rotor’s longitudinal axis to the given point of the tested unit. Initial data used were results of observation obtained after multiple reproductions of the given values of linear acceleration as well as numerical values of errors and measurement uncertainties of measuring equipment that was used when monitoring the rotary angular velocity and radial distance considering the contribution of each measurable parameter to a certain value of linear acceleration. The calculation given in the article estimates the limit of linear accelerations that can be attributed with established probability to the given value of linear acceleration reproduced when certificating the centrifugal machine. The design formulae are given to estimate the uncertainty components of the reproducible values of linear accelerations and the recommendations are given to present the uncertainty budget.

Annotation: The solid rocket motors thrust is measured according to the developed measurement procedure; fulfilment of its requirements guarantees obtaining the results with required accuracy parameters. Compliance of this procedure with the measurement accuracy requirements is confirmed by way of its validation that can be performed according to different algorithms. The proposed article deals with two validation algorithms of measurement procedure for solid rocket motor thrust up to 30 tf – end-to-end and link-by-link validation methods. The composition of measurement channel, the experimental works performed at each validation algorithm are described, the calculation formulas to evaluate the limits of absolute measurement error and the obtained numerical values of the latter are presented. The comparative analysis of the results of validation procedure of solid rocket motor thrust measurement procedure obtained during metrological investigations of thrust measurement channel by end-to-end and link-by-link validation methods shows that to ensure the required measurement accuracy, the algorithms of end-to-end method is preferable, at which the lower values of reduced error can be obtained as compared with the algorithm of link-by-link validation.