Search Results for “augmented measurement uncertainty” – Collected book of scientific-technical articles https://journal.yuzhnoye.com Space technology. Missile armaments Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:55:19 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/logo_1.svg Search Results for “augmented measurement uncertainty” – Collected book of scientific-technical articles https://journal.yuzhnoye.com 32 32 22.2.2018 Uncertainty Calculation Procedure during Measuring Instrumentation Calibration https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/content_2018_2-en/annot_22_2_2018-en/ Thu, 07 Sep 2023 12:34:07 +0000 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/?page_id=30810
This article proposes the measurement uncertainty calculation procedure during measuring instrumentation calibration, according to which the following calculations shall be made: a) of standard uncertainty of A type for corrected observation results obtained during calibration; b) of standard uncertainties of B type caused by error or uncertainty of working standard applied, calculation discreteness or calibrated measuring instrument division value, variation of calibrated measuring instrument indications; c) of total standard measurement uncertainty; d) of augmented measurement uncertainty. As an example, the results of calculation of augmented measurement uncertainty during calibration are presented: – Key words: augmented measurement uncertainty , multiple measurements , measurement uncertainty budget , vibrometer , manometer of MT type , computing complex of MIC type Bibliography: 1. augmented measurement uncertainty , multiple measurements , measurement uncertainty budget , vibrometer , manometer of MT type , computing complex of MIC type .
]]>

22. Uncertainty Calculation Procedure during Measuring Instrumentation Calibration

Organization:

Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2018 (2); 184-189

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2018.02.184

Language: Russian

Annotation: The effective documents in the field of metrological support require evaluating measurement uncertainty during measuring instrumentation calibration. In Ukraine, there is no regulated procedure of uncertainty calculation during measuring instrumentation calibration, which causes the necessity of developing such procedure. This article proposes the measurement uncertainty calculation procedure during measuring instrumentation calibration, according to which the following calculations shall be made: a) of standard uncertainty of A type for corrected observation results obtained during calibration; b) of standard uncertainties of B type caused by error or uncertainty of working standard applied, calculation discreteness or calibrated measuring instrument division value, variation of calibrated measuring instrument indications; c) of total standard measurement uncertainty; d) of augmented measurement uncertainty. As an example, the results of calculation of augmented measurement uncertainty during calibration are presented: – for 795M107B vibrometer in complete set with AC102-1A accelerometer; – for alternating voltage measurement channel of a measuring and computing complex of MIC type; – for a manometer of MT type. The obtained results of measurement uncertainty calculation are presented in the form of tables of measurement uncertainty budget, which shall be entered in the measuring instrument calibration certificate together with the observation results obtained during calibration. The proposed uncertainty calculation procedure is applicable for the given types of measuring instruments whose calibration is performed by method of direct measurement of known measurement values represented or controlled by working standards.

Key words: augmented measurement uncertainty, multiple measurements, measurement uncertainty budget, vibrometer, manometer of MT type, computing complex of MIC type

Bibliography:
1. The Law of Ukraine “On Metrology and Metrological Activity”. Supreme Rada News (SRN). 2014. No. 30. P. 1008.
2. General Requirements to Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories (ISO/IEC17025:2005, IDT): DSTU ISO/IEC17025:2006. К., 2007. 26 p.
3. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Geneva: ISO, 1993. 101 p.
4. Evaluation of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration: ЕА–4/02 М:2013. European Association for Accreditation, 2013. 75 p.
5. Bondar’ M. A et al. Methodology of Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation during Measuring Instrumentation Certification. Space Technology. Missile Armaments: Collection of scientific-technical articles. 2017. Issue 1. P. 3-7.
Downloads: 36
Abstract views: 
1727
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
CountryCityDownloads
USA Ashburn; Matawan; Baltimore; Plano; Columbus; Columbus; Detroit; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Ashburn; Boardman; Seattle; Tappahannock; Portland; San Mateo; Des Moines; Boardman; Boardman; Ashburn20
Singapore Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore8
Indonesia Sidoarjo1
Finland Helsinki1
Unknown1
Canada Monreale1
Germany Falkenstein1
Romania Voluntari1
Netherlands Amsterdam1
Ukraine Dnipro1
22.2.2018 Uncertainty Calculation Procedure during Measuring Instrumentation Calibration
22.2.2018 Uncertainty Calculation Procedure during Measuring Instrumentation Calibration
22.2.2018 Uncertainty Calculation Procedure during Measuring Instrumentation Calibration

Keywords cloud

]]>