Keywords cloud
The fullscale testing (flight tests) is an integral part of their creation. In the process of flight tests of tactical and shortrange missiles with cassette warheads, the safety issues are topical. Key words: flight safety , flight tests , cassette warheards Bibliography: 1. flight safety , flight tests , cassette warheards .
]]>2. Mathematical models for assessment of safety in the impact area of cluster ammunition of the warhead during missile complex testing
Organization:
Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine
Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2019 (2); 11-17
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2019.02.011
Language: Russian
Annotation: One of the main types of arming of modern tactical and short-range missiles are cassette warheads based on nonguided blast-fragmentation submunitions that are widely used to kill group targets. The fullscale testing (flight tests) is an integral part of their creation. In the process of flight tests of tactical and shortrange missiles with cassette warheads, the safety issues are topical. Based on the capabilities of existing test ranges, it is planned to conduct such tests for the tactical and short-range missiles, being under development in Ukraine, in the Black sea water area where the cassette warheads with nonguided blastfragmentation submunitions (or their equivalents) will pose major hazard for ships. In the paper, two mathematical models are proposed to assess probability of killing (risk) a ship that may be present in the impact area of submunitions (submunitions equivalents) of cassette warhead. The first model was constructed in the assumption that the coverage area of cassette warhead and group dispersion of submunitions are known. Such model may be used to determine safety in the initial phases of cassette warheads development. The second model assumes that the configuration of cassette warhead and the scheme of submunitions firing were finalized, and accordingly, the nominal impact points of submunitions and their group and ind ividual dispersion are considered to be known. Practical application of both models requires the use of numerical procedures.
Key words: flight safety, flight tests, cassette warheards
Bibliography:
1. Balaganskiy I. A., Merzhievskiy L. A. Deistvie sredstv porazheniya i boepripasov: ucheb. Novosibirsk, 2004. 408 s.
2 Gradstein I. S., Ryzhik I. M. Tablitsy integralov, summ, ryadov i proizvedeniy. M., 1963. 1100 s.
Full text (PDF) || Content 2019 (2)
Downloads: 65
Abstract views:
1541
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
| Country | City | Downloads |
|---|---|---|
| USA | Burke; Ashburn; Ashburn; Matawan; Baltimore;; Boydton; Plano; Columbus; Columbus; Ashburn; Detroit; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Los Angeles; Ashburn; Ashburn; Seattle; Seattle; Ashburn; Houston; Ashburn; Seattle; Portland; San Mateo; Des Moines; Des Moines; Boardman; Ashburn; Boardman; Ashburn; Ashburn; Boardman | 41 |
| Singapore | Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore | 9 |
| Canada | Toronto; Toronto; Toronto; Monreale | 4 |
| Ukraine | Dnipro; Kremenchuk; Dnipro | 3 |
| Germany | ; Falkenstein | 2 |
| Netherlands | Amsterdam; Amsterdam | 2 |
| Finland | Helsinki | 1 |
| Unknown | 1 | |
| Bangladesh | Dhaka | 1 |
| Romania | Voluntari | 1 |
2018 (2); 157-172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2018.02.157 Language: Russian Annotation: The measurement errors upon conducting flight tests for launch vehicles are evaluated by considering the interferences and uncertainties in the measurement system procedure. Key words: flight tests , sensor , measurement error , mathematical model Bibliography: 1. Flight Tests of Rockets and Spacecraft. flight tests , sensor , measurement error , mathematical model .
]]>19. Control of Validity and Assessment of Accuracy of Telemetry Results during Full-Scale Test of Launch Vehicles
Organization:
Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine
Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2018 (2); 157-172
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2018.02.157
Language: Russian
Annotation: The measurement errors upon conducting flight tests for launch vehicles are evaluated by considering the interferences and uncertainties in the measurement system procedure. Formal use of this approach can lead to unpredictable consequences. More reliable evaluation of errors upon conducted measurements can be achieved if the measurement process is regarded as a procedure of successive activities for designing, manufacturing, and testing the measurement system and the rocket including measurements and their processing during the after-flight analysis of the received data. The sampling rates of the main controlled parameters are three to ten times higher than the frequency range of their changing. Therefore, it is possible to determine the characteristics of the random error components directly on the basis of registered data. The unrevealed systematic components create the basic uncertainty in the evaluation of the examined parameter’s total measurement error. To evaluate the precision and measurement accuracy of a particular launch, the article suggests specifying the preliminary data on measurement error components determined during prelaunch processing and launch. Basic structures of algorithms for evaluation of precision and measurement accuracy for certain mathematical models that form the measured parameters were considered along with the practical case when static correlation existed among the measured parameters.
Key words: flight tests, sensor, measurement error, mathematical model
Bibliography:
1. Novitsky P. V., Zograf I. A. Evaluation of Measurement Errors. L., 1985. 248 p.
2. Shmutzer E. Relativity Theory. Modern Conception. Way to Unity of Physics. М., 1981. 230 p.
3. Blekhman I. I., Myshkis A. D., Panovenko Y. G. Applied Mathematics: Subject, Logic, Peculiarities of Approaches. К., 1976. 270 p.
4. Moiseyev N. N. Mathematical Problems of System Analysis. М., 1981. 488 p.
5. Bryson A., Ho Yu-Shi. Applied Theory of Optimal Control. М., 1972. 544 p.
6. Yevlanov L. G. Monitoring of Dynamic Systems. М., 1972. 424 p.
7. Sergiyenko A. B. Digital Signal Processing: Collection of publications. 2011. 768 p.
8. Braslavsky D. A., Petrov V. V. Precision of Measuring Devices. М., 1976. 312 p.
9. Glinchenko A. S. Digital Signal Processing: Course of lectures. Krasnoyarsk, 2008. 242 p.
10. Garmanov A. V. Practice of Optimization of Signal-Noise Ratio at ACP Connection in Real Conditions. М., 2002. 9 p.
11. Denosenko V. V., Khalyavko A. N. Interference Protection of Sensors and Connecting Wires of Industrial Automation Systems. SТА. No. 1. 2001. P. 68-75.
12. Garmanov A. V. Connection of Measuring Instruments. Solution of Electric Compatibility and Interference Protection Problems. М., 2003. 41 p.
13. TP ACS Encyclopedia. bookASUTR.ru.
14. Smolyak S. A., Titarenko B. P. Stable Estimation Methods. М., 1980. 208 p.
15. Fomin A. F. et al. Rejection of Abnormal Measurement Results. М., 1985. 200 p.
16. Medich J. Statistically Optimal Linear Estimations and Control. М., 1973. 440 p.
17. Sage E., Mells J. Estimation Theory and its Application in Communication and Control. М., 1976. 496 p.
18. Filtration and Stochastic Control in Dynamic Systems: Collection of articles / Under the editorship of K. T. Leondes. М., 1980. 408 p.
19. Krinetsky E. I. et al. Flight Tests of Rockets and Spacecraft. М., 1979. 464 p.
20. Viduyev N. G., Grigorenko A. G. Mathematical Processing of Geodesic Measurements. К., 1978. 376 p.
21. Aivazyan S. A., Yenyukov I. S., Meshalkin L. D. Applied Statistics. Investigation of Dependencies. М., 1985. 487 p.
22. Sirenko V. N., Il’yenko P. V., Semenenko P. V. Use of Statistic Approaches in Analysis of Gas Dynamic Parameters in LV Vented Bays. Space Technology. Missile Armaments: Collection of scientific-technical articles. Issue 1. P. 43-47.
23. Granovsky V. A., Siraya T. N. Methods of Experimental Data Processing at Measurements. L., 1990. 288 p.
24. Zhovinsky A. N., Zhovinsky V. N. Engineering Express Analysis of Random Processes. М., 1979. 112 p.
25. Anishchenko V. A. Control of Authenticity of Duplicated Measurements in Uncertainty Conditions. University News. Minsk, 2010. No. 2. P. 11-18.
26. Anishchenko V. A. Reliability and Accuracy of Triple Measurements of Analog Technological Variables. University News. Minsk, 2017. No. 2. P. 108-117.
27. Shenk H. Theory of Engineering Experiment. М., 1972. 381 p.
28. Bessonov А. А., Sverdlov L. Z. Methods of Statistic Analysis of Automatic Devices Errors. L., 1974. 144 p.
29. Pugachyov V. N. Combined Methods to Determine Probabilistic Characteristics. М., 1973. 256 p. https://doi.org/10.21122/1029-7448-2017-60-2-108-117
30. Gandin L. S., Kagan R. L. Statistic Methods of Meteorological Data Interpretation. L., 1976. 360 p.
31. Zheleznov I. G., Semyonov G. P. Combined Estimation of Complex Systems Characteristics. М., 1976. 52 p.
32. Vt222М Absolute Pressure Sensor: ТU Vt2.832.075TU. Penza, 1983.
Full text (PDF) || Content 2018 (2)
Downloads: 59
Abstract views:
1262
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
| Country | City | Downloads |
|---|---|---|
| USA | Boardman; Matawan; Baltimore; North Bergen; Boydton; Plano; Miami; Columbus; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Ashburn; Seattle; Seattle; Seattle; Ashburn; Ashburn; Mountain View; Ashburn; Seattle; Portland; Portland; Portland; San Mateo; San Mateo; San Mateo; Des Moines; Boardman; Ashburn; Ashburn | 40 |
| Singapore | Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore | 6 |
| Canada | Toronto; Toronto; Toronto; Monreale | 4 |
| Indonesia | Jakarta | 1 |
| China | Shanghai | 1 |
| Finland | Helsinki | 1 |
| Unknown | 1 | |
| Great Britain | London | 1 |
| Germany | Falkenstein | 1 |
| Romania | Voluntari | 1 |
| Netherlands | Amsterdam | 1 |
| Ukraine | Dnipro | 1 |
Keywords cloud
The satisfactory convergence of the pneumatic system parameters calculation results with the experimental data from the ground and flight tests is shown.
]]>19. Experience in Development of Pneumatic System for Aerodynamic Payload Fairing Separation
Organization:
Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine
Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2017 (2); 107-111
Language: Russian
Annotation: The paper presents the generalized experience of designing and development testing of the pneumatic system for nose aerodynamic fairing halves jettisoning. The algorithm of its parameters calculation is given. The satisfactory convergence of the pneumatic system parameters calculation results with the experimental data from the ground and flight tests is shown.
Key words:
Bibliography:
1. Basis of Calculation of Gas Parameters in Pneumatic Systems Operation: Teacher Edition of Yuzhnoye SDO. 21.7217.123 ОТ. 1988.
2. Cyclone-4 SLS. Analysis of Experimental Data on PLF Doors Jettison Pneumatic System: Technical Report / Yuzhnoye SDO. Cyclone-4 21.17689.213 ОТ. 2014.
Full text (PDF) || Content 2017 (2)
Downloads: 61
Abstract views:
465
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
| Country | City | Downloads |
|---|---|---|
| USA | Boardman; Matawan; Baltimore; Boydton; Dublin; Dublin; Ashburn; Ashburn; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Seattle; Seattle; Ashburn; Ashburn; Houston; Seattle; Portland; San Mateo; San Mateo; Ashburn; Ashburn; Des Moines; Boardman; Boardman; Ashburn; Boardman | 39 |
| Singapore | Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore | 7 |
| Canada | Toronto; Toronto; Toronto; Toronto; Toronto; Monreale | 6 |
| Ukraine | Dnipro; Dnipro; Odessa | 3 |
| Netherlands | Amsterdam; Amsterdam | 2 |
| Finland | Helsinki | 1 |
| Germany | Falkenstein | 1 |
| Latvia | Riga | 1 |
| Romania | Voluntari | 1 |
Generally, these are factory tests, participation in system and integrated tests and participation in flight tests of a space rocket.
]]>11. Peculiarities of Development Testing of Space Rocket Thermostating System Mating Points Hoses
Organization:
Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine1; State Enterprise DINTEM Ukrainian Research Design-Technological Institute of Elastomer Materials and Products2
Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2019, (1); 76-80
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2019.01.076
Language: Russian
Annotation: The range of problems of development testing of thermostating systems mating hoses for the needs of space rocketry building is most topical. In publications, insufficient attention is given to the presented range of problems. The purpose of this article is to fill in this gap. Testing of the hoses performed in accordance with comprehensive program implies a number of sequential tests and has its peculiarities. Generally, these are factory tests, participation in system and integrated tests and participation in flight tests of a space rocket. Special reference was made to the role of accelerated climatic tests, as a part of factory tests, to confirm warranty obligations for the hoses. In conclusion of the article, the concept was formulated on organization of development testing of space rockets thermostating systems hoses that reflects test peculiarities and the conclusion was made that conducting the testing of hoses according to the presented sequence ensures creation of articles that meet the requirements imposed.
Key words: space launch system, launch site, launch complex, comprehensive development test program, test program and procedure, accelerated climatic tests, integrated tests
Bibliography:
1. Degtyarev A. V., Kashanov A. E., Krivobokov L. V. Systemnyi podkhod k planirovaniyu eksperimentalnoy otrabotki novykh i modernizuemykh raket-nositeley /Systemnye technologii: Regional. mezhvuz. sb. nauch. trudov. 2011. 196 p.
2. Dunaev D. V., Krivobokov L. V. Obosnovanie vidov ispytaniy pri sozdaniy compleksnoi programmy eksperimentalnoy otrabotki typovoy rakety kosmicheskogo naznacheniya/ Aviatsionno-kosmicheskaya technika I technologia. №4. 2015. P. 26-31.
3. Dunaev D. V., Krivobokov L. V. Analiz matematicheskikh modeley otsenki nadezhnosti raketnoy techniki pri eksperimentalnoy otrabotke/ Kosmicheskaya technika. Raketnoe vooruzhenie: Sb. nauch.- techn. st. 2015. Vyp. 1. Dnepropetrovsk: GP KB «Yuzhnoye». P. 3-8.
4. Bigun S. O., Chorolskiy M. S. Shlyakhi stvorennya vuzliv stykuvannya system termostatuvannya raket kosmichnogo pryznachennya/ Cholodilna technika I technologia: Nauk.-techn. journal. 2018. T. 54. Vyp. 1. Odessa: ONAKhT. P. 27-30.
5. Bigun S. A., Skokov A. I. Razrabotka I sozdanie ustanovki dkya ispytaniy uzlov stykovki system termostatirovaniya raket-nositeley/ Kosmicheskaya technika. Raketnoye vooruzhenie: Sb. nauch.- techn. st. 2015. Vyp. 3. Dnepropetrovsk: GP KB «Yuzhnoye». P. 107-110.
6. Bigun S. A., Khorolskiy M. S. i dr. Eksperimentalnyie issledovania rezultatov otrabotrki uzlov stykovki systemy termostatirovania RKN Cyclone-4 / Kosmicheskaya technika. Raketnoye vooruzhenie: Sb. nauch.- techn. st. 2016. Vyp. 2. Dnepropetrovsk: GP KB «Yuzhnoye». P. 43-51.
7. KRK Cuclone-4. Rukava uzlov razovogo deistviya systemy termostatirovania 2G40 i rukava stykovki adaptera transportnoy systemy termostatirovania 2G20: Complexsnaya programma eksperimentalnoy otrabotki D4301.25009. 00.00 KPEO/GP UNIKTI DINTEM, GP KB «Yuzhnoye». 2011. 20 p.
Full text (PDF) || Content 2019 (1)
Downloads: 64
Abstract views:
489
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
| Country | City | Downloads |
|---|---|---|
| USA | Boardman; Springfield; Matawan; North Bergen; Plano; Miami; Dublin; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Ashburn; Ashburn; Seattle; Columbus; Ashburn; Quinton; Houston; Houston; Ashburn; Boardman; Tappahannock; San Mateo; San Mateo; San Mateo; San Mateo; Ashburn; Columbus; Des Moines; Boardman; Boardman; Ashburn; Ashburn; Boardman; Ashburn | 43 |
| Canada | Toronto; Toronto; Toronto; Toronto; Toronto; Monreale | 6 |
| Singapore | Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore | 5 |
| Unknown | Sidney; Hong Kong | 2 |
| India | Mumbai | 1 |
| Finland | Helsinki | 1 |
| France | 1 | |
| Algeria | Béchar | 1 |
| Germany | Falkenstein | 1 |
| Romania | Voluntari | 1 |
| Netherlands | Amsterdam | 1 |
| Ukraine | Dnipro | 1 |
Keywords cloud