Search Results for “main solid rocket motor” – Collected book of scientific-technical articles https://journal.yuzhnoye.com Space technology. Missile armaments Tue, 05 Nov 2024 21:15:15 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/logo_1.svg Search Results for “main solid rocket motor” – Collected book of scientific-technical articles https://journal.yuzhnoye.com 32 32 2.1.2020 Analysis of development trends of design parameters and basic characteristics of missiles for the advanced multiple launch rocket systems https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/content_2020_1-en/annot_2_1_2020-en/ https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/?page_id=31001
complex problem of the optimal control theory , problem of nonlinear mathematical programming , main solid rocket motor , limitations for motion parameters and basic characteristics of the guided missiles Bibliography: 1. complex problem of the optimal control theory , problem of nonlinear mathematical programming , main solid rocket motor , limitations for motion parameters and basic characteristics of the guided missiles .
]]>

2. Analysis of development trends of design parameters and basic characteristics of missiles for the advanced multiple launch rocket systems

Organization:

Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine1; The Institute of Technical Mechanics, Dnipro, Ukraine2

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2020, (1); 13-25

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2020.01.013

Language: Russian

Annotation: The scientific and methodological propositions for the designing single-stage guided missiles with the solid rocket motors for advanced multiple launch rocket systems are defined. The guided missiles of multiple launch rocket system are intended for delivering munitions to the given spatial point with required and specified kinematic motion parameters at the end of flight. The aim of the article is an analysis of the development trends of the guided missiles with the solid rocket motors for the multiple launch rocket systems, identifying the characteristics and requirements for the flight trajectories, design parameters, control programs, overall dimensions and mass characteristics, structural layout and aerodynamic schemes of missiles. The formalization of the complex task to optimize design parameters, trajectory parameters and motion control programs for the guided missiles capable of flying along the ballistic, aeroballistic or combined trajectories is given. The complex task belongs to a problem of the optimal control theory with limitations in form of equa lity, inequality and differential constraints. To simplify the problem, an approach to program forming is proposed for motion control in the form of polynomial that brings the problem of the optimal control theory to a simpler problem of nonlinear mathematical programming. When trajectory parameters were calculated the missile was regarded as a material point of variable mass and the combined equations for center-of-mass motion of the guided missile with projections on axes of the terrestrial reference system were used. The structure of the mathematical model was given along with the calculation sequence of the criterion function that was used for determination of the optimal parameters, programs and characteristics. The mathematical model of the guided missile provides adequate accuracy for design study to determine depending on the main design parameters: overall dimensions and mass characteristics of the guided missile in general and its structural comp onents and subsystems; power, thrust and consumption characteristics of the rocket motor; aerodynamic and ballistic characteristics of the guided missile. The developed methodology was tested by determining design and trajectory parameters, overall dimensions and mass characteristics, power and ballistic characteristics of two guided missiles with wings for advanced multiple launch rocket systems produced by the People’s Republic of China, using the limited amount of information available in the product catalog.

Key words: multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS), complex problem of the optimal control theory, problem of nonlinear mathematical programming, main solid rocket motor, limitations for motion parameters and basic characteristics of the guided missiles

Bibliography:
1. Degtyarev A. V. Raketnaia tekhnika. Problemy i perspektivy: izbrannye nauchno-tekhnicheskie publikatsii. Dnepropetrovsk, 2014. 420 s.
2. Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku zdiisnennia derzhavnoho kontriliu za mizhnarodnymy peredachamy tovariv podviinoho vykorystannia:Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 28 sichnia 2004 r. № 86. Date: 29.11.2018. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/86-2004-%D0%BF (Access date 01.09.2019).
3. Catalogue China Aerospase Long-march International. February, 2017. 136 p.
4. Reaktivnye sistemy zalpovogo ognia zarubezhnykh stran: obzor po materialam otkrytoi pechati za 1987–2016 gg. i interneta. Dnipro, 2016. Ч. I. 205 s.
5. Upravliaemye OTRK i TRK stran mira: obzor po materialam otkrytoi otechestvennoi i zarubezhnoi pechati za 2008–2014 gg. i interneta. Dnipro, 2014. 162 s.
6. Tail controlled rocket demonstrates near-vertical impact at extended range. URL: https://www.army.mil/article-amp/207357/tail_controlled_rocket_demonstrates_near_vertical_impact_at_extended_range (Access date 01.09.2019).
7. SY-400 Short-Range Ballistic Missile. URL: http://www.military-today.com/missiles/sy_400.htm (Access date 01.09.2019).
8. Vohniana “Vilkha”: nova vysokotochna systema zalpovoho vohnyu. Vpershe – detalno. URL: https://defence-ua.com/index.php/statti/4588-vohnyana-vilkha-nova-vysokotochna-systema-zalpovoho-vohnyu-vpershe-detalno (Access date 01.09.2019).
9. Gurov S. V. Reaktivnye sistemy zalpovogo ognia: obzor. 1-е izd. Tula, 2006. 432 s.
10. The new M30A1 GMLRS Alternate Warhead to replace cluster bombs for US Army Central 71601171. URL: https://www.armyrecognition.com/weapons_defence_industry_military_technology_uk/the_new_m30a1_gmlrs_alternate_warhead_to_replace_cluster_bombs_for_us_army_central_71601171.html (Access date 01.09.2019).
11. High-Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS), a member of MLRS family. URL: https://army-technology.com/projects/himars/ (Access date 01.09.2019).
12. SR-5 Multiple Launch Rocket System. URL: http://www.military-today.com/artillery/sr5.htm (Access date 01.09.2019).
13. Effectivnost slozhnykh system. Dinamicheskie modeli / V. А. Vinogradov, V. А. Hrushchansky, S. S. Dovhodush i dr. М., 1989. 285 s.
14. Ilichev А. V., Volkov V. D., Hrushchansky V. А. Effectivnost proektiruemykh elementov slozhnykh system: ucheb. posobie. М., 1982. 280 s.
15. Krotov V. F., Gurman V. I. Metody I zadachi optimalnogo upravleniia. М., 1973. 446 s.
16. Pontriagin L. S., Boltiansky V. G., Gamkrelidze R. V., Mishchenko Е. F. Matematicheskaia teoriia optimalnykh protsesov. М., 1969. 385 s.
17. Tarasov Е. V. Algoritm optimalnogo proektirovaniia letatelnogo apparata. М., 1970. 364 s.
18. Shcheverov D. N. Proektirovanie bespilotnykh letatelnykh apparatov. М., 1978. 264 s.
19. Siniukov А. М., Volkov L. I., Lvov А. I., Shishkevich А. М. Ballisticheskaia raketa na tverdom toplive / pod red. А. М. Siniukova. М., 1972. 511 s.
20. Burov М. А., Varfolomeev V. I., Volkov L. I. Proektirovanie i ispytanie ballisticheskikh raket / pod red. V. I. Varfolomeeva, М. I. Kopytova. М., 1970. 392 s.
21. Siutkina-Doronina S. V. K voprosu optimizatsii proektnykh parametrov i programm upravleniia raketnogo ob’ekta s raketnym dvigatelem na tverdom toplive. Aviatsionno-kosmicheskaia tekhnika i tekhnologiia. 2017. № 2 (137). S. 44–59.
22. Aksenenko A. V., Baranov E. Yu., Hursky A. I., Klochkov A. S., Morozov A. S., Alpatov A. P., Senkin V. S., Siutkina-Doronina S. V. Metodicheskoe obespechenie dlia optimizatsii na nachalnom etape proektirovaniia proektnykh parametrov, parametrov traektorii i programm upravleniia dvizheniem raketnogo ob’ekta. Kosmicheskaia tekhnika. Raketnoe vooruzhenie: sb. nauch.-tekhn. st. / GP “KB “Yuzhnoye”. Dnipro, 2018. Vyp. 2 (116). S. 101–116. https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2018.02.101
23. Metodicheskoe obespechenie dlia optimizatsii na nachalnom etape proektirovaniia proektnykh parametrov, programm upravleniia, ballisticheskikh, energeticheskikh i gabaritno-massovykh kharakteristik upravliaemykh raketnykh ob’ektov, osushchestvliaiushchikh dvizhenie po aeroballisticheskoi traektorii: otchet po NIR / ITM NANU i GKAU, GP “KB “Yuzhnoye”. Dnepropetrovsk, 2017. 159 S.
24. Senkin V. S. K Vyboru programm upravleniia dvizheniem raketnogo ob’ekta po ballisticheskoi traektorii. Tekhnicheskaia mekhanika. 2018. № 1. S. 48–59.
25. Alpatov A. P., Senkin V. S. Metodicheskoe obespechenie dlia vybora oblika, optimizatsii proektnykh parametrov i programm upravleniia poletom rakety-nositelia. Tekhnicheskaia mekhanika. 2013. № 4. S. 146–161.
26. Alpatov A. P., Senkin V. S. Kompleksnaia zadacha optimizatsii osnovnykh proektnykh parametrov i programm upravleniia dvizheniem raket kosmicheskogo naznacheniia. Tekhnicheskaia mekhanika. 2011. № 4. S. 98–113.
27. Senkin V. S. Optimizatsiia proektnykh parametrov rakety-nositelia sverkhlegkogo klassa. Tekhnicheskaia mekhanika. 2009. № 1. S. 80–88.
28. Lebedev А. А., Gerasiuta N. F. Ballistika raket. М., 1970. 244 s.
29. Razumev V. F., Kovalev B. K. Osnovy proektirovaniia ballisticheskikh raket na tverdom toplive: ucheb. posobie dlia vuzov. М., 1976. 356 s.
30. Erokhin B. Т. Teoreticheskie osnovy oroektirovaniia RDTT. М., 1982. 206 s.
31. Abugov D. I., Bobylev V. М. Teoriia i raschet raketnykh dvigatelei tverdogo topliva: uchebnik dlia mashinostroitelnykh vuzov. М., 1987. 272 s.
32. Shishkov А. А. Gasodinamika porokhovykh raketnykh dvigatelei: inzhenernye metody rascheta. М., 1974. 156 s.
Downloads: 42
Abstract views: 
3505
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
CountryCityDownloads
USA Ashburn; Matawan; Baltimore; Plano; Miami; Columbus; Columbus; Columbus; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Ashburn; Tappahannock; Portland; San Mateo; San Mateo; San Mateo; Des Moines; Boardman; Boardman; Boardman; Seattle24
Singapore Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore6
Latvia Riga; Riga2
Ukraine Dnipro; Dnipro2
China Shanghai1
Finland Helsinki1
Unknown1
India Mumbai1
Canada Monreale1
Germany Falkenstein1
Romania Voluntari1
Netherlands Amsterdam1
2.1.2020 Analysis of development trends of design parameters and basic characteristics of missiles for the advanced multiple launch rocket systems
2.1.2020 Analysis of development trends of design parameters and basic characteristics of missiles for the advanced multiple launch rocket systems
2.1.2020 Analysis of development trends of design parameters and basic characteristics of missiles for the advanced multiple launch rocket systems

Keywords cloud

]]>
8.1.2024 Theoretic-experimental evaluation of the solid-propellant grain erosive burning https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/content_2024_1-en/annot_8_1_2024-en/ Mon, 17 Jun 2024 08:41:58 +0000 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/?page_id=35027
2024, (1); 72-77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2024.01.072 Language: Ukrainian Annotation: The high demands for the flow rate and thrust characteristics specified for the modern solid-propellant rocket motors (SRM) under the strict mass and overall dimensions constraints require high level of mass fraction of propellant. It is typical of the main SRMs of various rocket systems (multiple launch rocket systems, anti-aircraft guided missiles, tactical missiles, boosters). This paper proposes a methodology for calculating the internal ballistic characteristics of a solid propellant rocket motor under erosive burning, which is relatively time and resource consuming. Key words: rocket motor , solid propellant , erosive burning , internal ballistic characteristics Bibliography: Arkhipov V. rocket motor , solid propellant , erosive burning , internal ballistic characteristics .
]]>

8. Theoretic-experimental evaluation of the solid-propellant grain erosive burning

Автори: Taran M. V., Moroz V. G.

Organization: Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2024, (1); 72-77

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2024.01.072

Language: Ukrainian

Annotation: The high demands for the flow rate and thrust characteristics specified for the modern solid-propellant rocket motors (SRM) under the strict mass and overall dimensions constraints require high level of mass fraction of propellant. And in the process of propellant grain combustion, erosive burning often takes place (increase of propellant burning rate depending on combustion products flow rate along the grain channel). This may play both negative (off-design increase of chamber pressure) and positive role (for example, increasing the launch thrust-to-weight ratio of the rocket). It is typical of the main SRMs of various rocket systems (multiple launch rocket systems, anti-aircraft guided missiles, tactical missiles, boosters). This paper proposes a methodology for calculating the internal ballistic characteristics of a solid propellant rocket motor under erosive burning, which is relatively time and resource consuming. The methodology is based on equidistant model of propellant grain combustion, where grain is divided lengthwise into a number of intervals. For any point of time during the engine operation, burning area and port area of each interval are calculated, taking into account erosive impact on each interval; total burning area is the sum of all intervals burning areas. Gas flow rate in each interval of the grain channel is calculated using gas-dynamic equations. The motor mass flow rate is a mass input sum of all the intervals; and the burning rate in each interval is estimated with proper erosion factor. The combustion chamber pressure had been calculated for four erosive burning models proposed by different authors. All the models showed convergence with the experimental SRM test data sufficient for engineering estimate (in particular, for maximum chamber pressure and combustion time). Selected as a result erosive burning model may be used to design new motors with solid propellants similar in chemical composition, and the model parameters are to be further customized using the test specimens.

Key words: rocket motor, solid propellant, erosive burning, internal ballistic characteristics

Bibliography:
  1. Arkhipov V. Erosionnoe gorenie condensirovannykh system. Sb. tr. ІХ Vserossiyskoy nauch. conf. 2016 g. (FPPSM-2016). Tomsk, 2016.
  2. Mukunda S., Paul P. J. Universal behaviour in erosive burning of solid propellants. Combustion and flame, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(96)00150-2
  3. Sabdenov K. , Erzda M., Zarko V. Ye. Priroda i raschet skorosti erozionnogo goreniya tverdogo raketnogo topliva. Inzhenerniy journal: nauka i innovatsii, 2013. Vyp. 4.
  4. Evlanova A., Evlanov A. A., Nikolaeva Ye. V. Identifikatsiya parametrov erozionnogo goreniya topliva po dannym ognevykh stendovykh ispytaniy. Izvestiya TulGU. Tekhn. nauki. 2014. Vyp. 12, ch. 1.
  5. Yanjie Ma, Futing Bao, Lin Sun, Yang Liu, and Weihua Hui. A New Erosive Burning Model of Solid Propellant Based on Heat Transfer Equilibrium at Propellant Surface. Hindawi International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2020, Article ID 8889333. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8889333
  6. Williams, Forman A., Combustion Theory. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing , Menlo Park, 1985.
  7. Irov Yu. D., Keil E. V., Maslov B.N., Pavlukhin Yu. A., Porodenko V. V.,
    Stepanov Ye. A. Gasodynamicheskie funktsii. Mashinostroenie, Moskva, 1965.
  8. William Orvis. EXCEL dlya uchenykh, inzhenerov i studentov. Kiev: «Junior», 1999.
Downloads: 11
Abstract views: 
412
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
CountryCityDownloads
USA Las Vegas; Columbus; Ashburn; Portland4
Germany Falkenstein; Falkenstein2
France1
Unknown1
China Shenzhen1
Russia Saint Petersburg1
Ukraine Kremenchuk1
8.1.2024 Theoretic-experimental evaluation of the solid-propellant grain erosive burning
8.1.2024 Theoretic-experimental evaluation of the solid-propellant grain erosive burning
8.1.2024 Theoretic-experimental evaluation of the solid-propellant grain erosive burning

Keywords cloud

Your browser doesn't support the HTML5 CANVAS tag.
]]>
10.1.2020 Calculation and selection of parameters for a propellant consumption diagram of dual-thrust main SRM https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/content_2020_1-en/annot_10_1_2020-en/ https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/?page_id=31037
2020, (1); 99-106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2020.01.099 Language: Russian Annotation: The main solid rocket motors of surface-to-air missiles and some short-range missiles have, as a rule, two operation modes – starting (augmented rating) and cruise (with decreased propellant consumption level).
]]>

10. Calculation and selection of parameters for a propellant consumption diagram of dual-thrust main SRM

Organization:

Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2020, (1); 99-106

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2020.01.099

Language: Russian

Annotation: The main solid rocket motors of surface-to-air missiles and some short-range missiles have, as a rule, two operation modes – starting (augmented rating) and cruise (with decreased propellant consumption level). The methods to calculate intraballistic characteristics of such motors have a number of peculiarities, which set them apart from the methods of determining the characteristics of motors with constant propellant consumption level. The purpose of this article is to analyze such peculiarities, design methods, to find interrelation between the parameters of propellant consumption diagram, to determine the impact on the latter of motor design features and propellant characteristics. To achieve this goal, the method of analytical dependencies was developed. The equations obtained show that the required parameters of diagrams (including consumption-thrust characteristics difference between the starting and cruise modes) can be ensured due to varying either case diameter or propellant combustion rate or due to combined variation of these values. In practice, the cases are possible when for some reasons it does not seem possible to vary the case diameter or propellant combustion rate and the requirements to consumption diagram cannot be satisfied to the full extent. The task of motor developer in that case consists in determination of acceptable (alternative) propellant consumption diagrams that would be closest to required. The proposed method is based on calculation and construction of nomograms of dependencies of relative propellant consumption in cruse mode on relative time of starting leg at different propellant combustion rates and constant (required) case diameter and vice versa, at different values of case diameter and constant (available) propellant combustion rate. Using these nomograms, the rocket developer can determine the propellant consumption diagram acceptable for the rocket. In a number of cases, design limitations for separate main motor assemblies are imposed on consumption characteristic diagram that have an impact on its required parameters. The presented materials allow evaluating that impact and contain the proposals to remove it. The presented method allows quickly determining the conditions needed to fulfill required propellant combustion products consumption diagrams and in case of nonfulfillment of these conditions – allow presenting alternative options for selection of most acceptable one.

Key words: solid propellant charge mass, propellant combustion rate, combustion chamber pressure, operation time in starting and cruise modes, combustion chamber pressure difference

Bibliography:
1. K vyboru velichiny davliniia v kamere sgoraniia marshevykh RDTT: tekhn. otchet / GP “KB “Yuzhnoye”. Dnipro, 2017. 19 s.
2. Enotov V. G., Kushnir B. I., Pustovgarova Е. V. Avtomatizirovannaia proektnaia otsenka kharakteristik marshevykh dvigatelei na tverdom toplive s korpusom iz vysokoprochnykh metallicheskikh materialov takticheskikh i operativno-takticheskikh raket: ucheb.-metod. posobie / pod red. А. S. Kirichenko. Dnepropetrovsk, 2014. 72 s.
3. Sorkin R. Е. Gasotermodinamika raketnykh dvigatelei na tverdom toplive. М, 1967. 368 s.
Downloads: 40
Abstract views: 
1355
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
CountryCityDownloads
USA Boardman; Matawan; Baltimore; Plano; Dublin; Ashburn; Los Angeles; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Seattle; Columbus; Ashburn; Boardman; Seattle; Tappahannock; San Mateo; San Mateo; San Mateo; Des Moines; Boardman; Boardman; Ashburn; Boardman26
Singapore Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore6
Unknown Melbourne;2
Finland Helsinki1
Canada Monreale1
Germany Falkenstein1
Romania Voluntari1
Netherlands Amsterdam1
Ukraine Dnipro1
10.1.2020  Calculation and selection of parameters for a propellant consumption diagram of dual-thrust main SRM
10.1.2020  Calculation and selection of parameters for a propellant consumption diagram of dual-thrust main SRM
10.1.2020  Calculation and selection of parameters for a propellant consumption diagram of dual-thrust main SRM

Keywords cloud

]]>
12.2.2018 Methodological Support for Initial Phase Optimization of Projecting Design, Trajectory Parameters and Rocket Object Motion Control Programs https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/content_2018_2-en/annot_12_2_2018-en/ Thu, 07 Sep 2023 11:38:27 +0000 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/?page_id=30770
2018 (2); 101-116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2018.02.101 Language: Russian Annotation: The main scientific and methodological propositions for designing single-stage guided missiles with main solid rocket motors that are intended for delivering payload to the given spatial point with required and specified kinematic motion parameters are defined. Key words: complex problem of the optimal control theory , problem of nonlinear mathematical programming , main solid rocket motor , limitations for motion parameters and basic characteristics of the object Bibliography: 1. complex problem of the optimal control theory , problem of nonlinear mathematical programming , main solid rocket motor , limitations for motion parameters and basic characteristics of the object .
]]>

12. Methodological Support for Initial Phase Optimization of Projecting Design, Trajectory Parameters and Rocket Object Motion Control Programs

Organization:

Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine1; The Institute of Technical Mechanics, Dnipro, Ukraine2

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2018 (2); 101-116

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33136/stma2018.02.101

Language: Russian

Annotation: The main scientific and methodological propositions for designing single-stage guided missiles with main solid rocket motors that are intended for delivering payload to the given spatial point with required and specified kinematic motion parameters are defined. The aim of the article is to develop methodology for the early design phase to improve the basic characteristics of guided missiles, including formalization of complex problem to optimize design parameters, trajectory parameters and motion control programs for guided missiles capable of flying along the ballistic, aeroballistic or combined trajectories. The task is defined as a problem of the optimal control theory with limitations in form of equality, inequality and differential constraints. An approach to program forming is proposed for motion control in the form of polynomial that brings the problem of the optimal control theory to a simpler problem of nonlinear mathematical programming. When trajectory parameters were calculated the missile was regarded as material point of variable mass and the combined equations for center-of-mass motion of the guided missile with projections on axes of the terrestrial reference system were used. The structure of the mathematical model was given along with the calculation sequence of criterion functional that was used for optimization of design parameters, control programs and basic characteristics of the guided missile. The mathematical model of the guided missile provides adequate accuracy for design study to determine: overall dimensions and mass characteristics of the guided missile in general and its structural components and subsystems; power, thrust and consumption characteristics of the main engine; aerodynamic and ballistic characteristics of the guided missile. The developed methodology was tested by solving design problems. Applications of the developed program were studied to present the research results in a user-friendly form.

Key words: complex problem of the optimal control theory, problem of nonlinear mathematical programming, main solid rocket motor, limitations for motion parameters and basic characteristics of the object

Bibliography:
1. Degtyarev A. V. Rocket Engineering: Problems and Prospects. Selected scientific-technical publications. Dnepropetrovsk, 2014. 420 p.
2. Shcheverov D. N. Designing of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. М., 1978. 264 p.
3. Sinyukov А. М. et al. Ballistic Solid-Propellant Rocket / Under the editorship of A. M. Sinyukov. М., 1972. 511 p.
4. Varfolomeyev V. I. Designing and Testing of Ballistic Rockets / Under the editorship of V. I. Varfolomeyev, M. I. Kopytov. М., 1970. 392 p.
5. Vinogradov V. A., Grushchansky V. A., Dovgodush S. I. et al. Effectiveness of Complex Systems. Dynamic Models. М., 1989. 285 p.
6. Il’ichyov A. V., Volkov V. D., Grushchansky V. A. Effectiveness of Designed Complex Systems’ Elements. М., 1982. 280 p.
7. Krotov V. F., Gurman V. I. Methods and Problems of Optimal Control. М., 1973. 446 p.
8. Pontryagin L. S. et al. Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes. М., 1969. 385 p.
9. Tarasov E. V. Algorithms of Flying Vehicles Optimal Designing. М., 1970. 364 p.
10. Alpatov A. P., Sen’kin V. S. Complex Task of Optimization of Space Rocket Basic Design Parameters and Motion Control Programs. Technical Mechanics. 2011. No. 4. P. 98-113.
11. Alpatov A. P., Sen’kin V. S. Methodological Support for Selection of Launch Vehicle Configuration, Optimization of Design Parameters and Flight Control Programs. Technical Mechanics. 2013. No. 4. P. 146-161.
12. Sen’kin V. S. Optimization of Super-Light Launch Vehicle Design Parameters. Technical Mechanics. 2009. No. 1. P. 80-88.
13. Sen’kin V. S. Flight Control Optimization and Thrust Optimization of Controllable Rocket Object Main Propulsion System. Technical Mechanics. 2000. No. 1. P. 46-50.
14. Syutkina-Doronina S. V. On Problem of Optimization of Design Parameters and Control programs of a Rocket Object With Solid Rocket Motor. Aerospace Engineering and Technology. 2017. No. 2 (137). P. 44-59.
15. Lebedev А. А., Gerasyuta N. F. Rocket Ballistics. М., 1970. 244 p.
16. Razumov V. F., Kovalyov B. K. Design Basis of Solid-Propellant Ballistic Missiles. М., 1976. 356 p.
17. Yerokhin B. T. SRM Theoretical Design Basis. М., 1982. 206 p.
18. Abugov D. I., Bobylyov V. M. Theory and Calculation of Solid Rocket Motors. М., 1987. 272 p.
19. Shishkov А. А. Gas Dynamics of Powder Rocket Motors. М., 1974. 156 p.
20. Sen’kin V. S. Complex Task of Optimization of Super-Light Solid-Propellant Launch Vehicle Design Parameters and Control Programs. Technical Mechanics. 2012. No. 2. P. 106-121.
21. Methodological Support to Determine in Initial Designing Phase the Design Parameters, Control Programs, Ballistic, Power, and Mass-Dimensional Characteristics of Controllable Rocket Objects Moving In Aeroballistic Trajectory: R&D Report. ITM of NASU and SSAU, Yuzhnoye SDO. Inv. No. 40-09/2017. 2017. 159 p.
Downloads: 41
Abstract views: 
798
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
CountryCityDownloads
USA Boardman; Columbus; Matawan; Baltimore; Plano; Miami; Phoenix; Phoenix; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Seattle; Seattle; Ashburn; Seattle; Seattle; Tappahannock; Portland; San Mateo; Des Moines; Boardman; Ashburn; Ashburn23
Unknown; Brisbane;;4
Ukraine Kharkiv; Dnipro; Dnipro; Kyiv4
Singapore Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore4
Germany Frankfurt am Main; Falkenstein2
Finland Helsinki1
Canada Monreale1
Romania Voluntari1
Netherlands Amsterdam1
12.2.2018 Methodological Support for Initial Phase Optimization of Projecting Design, Trajectory Parameters and Rocket Object Motion Control Programs
12.2.2018 Methodological Support for Initial Phase Optimization of Projecting Design, Trajectory Parameters and Rocket Object Motion Control Programs
12.2.2018 Methodological Support for Initial Phase Optimization of Projecting Design, Trajectory Parameters and Rocket Object Motion Control Programs

Keywords cloud

]]>
1.1.2016 Solid Rocket Motors Developed by DO-5 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/content_2016_1/annot_1_1_2016-en/ Thu, 22 Jun 2023 11:52:04 +0000 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/?page_id=27589
Language: Russian Annotation: The main phases of formation and development of solid motor engineering are presented. The basic technical problems are considered, solution of which allowed building the main motors and dispensing motors with high performance level and highly-effective rocket systems on their basis Key words: Bibliography: Full text (PDF) ||
]]>

1. Solid Rocket Motors Developed by DO-5

Organization:

Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2016 (1); 4-12.

Language: Russian

Annotation: The main phases of formation and development of solid motor engineering are presented. The basic technical problems are considered, solution of which allowed building the main motors and dispensing motors with high performance level and highly-effective rocket systems on their basis

Key words:

Bibliography:
Downloads: 56
Abstract views: 
263
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
CountryCityDownloads
USA Boardman; Matawan; Baltimore; Dublin; Dublin; Phoenix; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Seattle; Ashburn; Ashburn; Boardman; Seattle; Seattle; Tappahannock; Portland;;; San Mateo; San Mateo; San Mateo; Des Moines; Boardman; Boardman; Ashburn; Boardman27
Ukraine Kyiv; Kyiv; Boryspil; Kyiv; Kharkiv; Kyiv; Kyiv; Dnipro; Pavlohrad; Kyiv; Kharkiv; Dnipro12
Singapore Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore6
Sweden Linköping; Linköping2
Germany Falkenstein; Hamburg2
Finland Helsinki1
France Paris1
Mongolia1
Canada Monreale1
Romania Voluntari1
Netherlands Amsterdam1
Bulgaria Plovdiv1
1.1.2016 Solid Rocket Motors Developed by DO-5
1.1.2016 Solid Rocket Motors Developed by DO-5
1.1.2016 Solid Rocket Motors Developed by DO-5
]]>
8.1.2016 Assessment of Validity of Hypothesis of Constancy of Specific Vacuum Thrust Pulse during SRM Designing and Testing https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/content_2016_1/annot_8_1_2016-en/ Tue, 23 May 2023 13:03:08 +0000 https://journal.yuzhnoye.com/?page_id=27614
2016 (1); 55-58 Language: Russian Annotation: In the phase of designing and developmental testing of short-range missiles with main solid rocket motors, the necessity arises of quick evaluation of propulsion system power characteristics, in particular, determination of specific thrust pulse value and scatter.
]]>

8. Assessment of Validity of Hypothesis of Constancy of Specific Vacuum Thrust Pulse during SRM Designing and Testing

Organization:

Yangel Yuzhnoye State Design Office, Dnipro, Ukraine

Page: Kosm. teh. Raket. vooruž. 2016 (1); 55-58

Language: Russian

Annotation: In the phase of designing and developmental testing of short-range missiles with main solid rocket motors, the necessity arises of quick evaluation of propulsion system power characteristics, in particular, determination of specific thrust pulse value and scatter. The use of hypothesis of specific thrust constancy (weak dependence of vacuum thrust pulse on pressure and temperature) allows to considerably simplify the procedure of SRM specific thrust pulse evaluation, thus increasing the efficiency of SRM design calculations and the speed of test results processing, and in some cases, even to considerably reduce the test scope.

Key words:

Bibliography:
Downloads: 40
Abstract views: 
337
Dynamics of article downloads
Dynamics of abstract views
Downloads geography
CountryCityDownloads
USA Boardman; Ashburn; Matawan; Baltimore;; Miami; Dublin; Phoenix; Phoenix; Monroe; Ashburn; Seattle; Columbus; Ashburn; Boardman; Seattle; Tappahannock; San Mateo; Boardman; Boardman; Ashburn; Ashburn22
Singapore Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore; Singapore6
Germany;; Falkenstein3
Ukraine Dnipro; Dnipro; Dnipro3
Finland Helsinki1
Unknown Hong Kong1
France1
Canada Monreale1
Romania Voluntari1
Netherlands Amsterdam1
8.1.2016 Assessment of Validity of Hypothesis of Constancy of Specific Vacuum Thrust Pulse during SRM Designing and Testing
8.1.2016 Assessment of Validity of Hypothesis of Constancy of Specific Vacuum Thrust Pulse during SRM Designing and Testing
8.1.2016 Assessment of Validity of Hypothesis of Constancy of Specific Vacuum Thrust Pulse during SRM Designing and Testing
]]>